(Which is correct so there’s nothing wrong with that)

One full tank of gas on your motorcycle could be enough for a lifetime…

(What I meant is: Capitalism is not relevant here. Maybe sometimes it is the root of the problem but not in every case (and certainly not in this one).

Cato_the_podasist did. The OP of this thread said that this post has nothing to do with capitalism and that we should therefore stop talking about it here. Cato_the_podasist argued against that saying that pointing out the source of the problem is always relevant, THEREBY IMPLYING that pointing out capitalism is always relevant (because capitalism doesnt have anything to do with this post specifically) so if its relevant here, then were is it not relevant?

Counter-counterpoint: Capitalism isnt the source of every problem and sometimes there isnt even a problem.

I was always under the impression that plants chemically convert CO2 and some other stuff to glucose (C6-H12-O6), right? In that case, the algae would still help, wouldnt they?

The NSA uses TOR themselves. Why would they even want it to be insecure?

TOR and VPN at once is just dumb and probably less secure than just using TOR.

The English “Yo” is a really good translation. You can use it to express surprise (“Alter! Wtf!” - “Yo! Wtf!”) or to address someone (“Alter, was geht?” - “Yo, whats up?”).

“Yo” really is the best translation I can think of.

They could live in a shelter indefinitely…

So homeless people dont exist then? Because where I live, everybody could go to a shelter for as long as they like.

Yeah they do, actually. At least in most countries…

So you propose an anarchy? I dont think that would go well.

Poverty rates in former USSR countries have bwen steadily declining since its downfall. Its still widespread but how is capitalism at fault for it?

There is a thing called “homeless shelter” and Im pretty sure its more than just a tent

Oh yes, generalizing. At least you didnt write any racist jokes (yet)…

Thats true but they also usually contain things like the pictures hash so as long as you have the file you can always claim it (even if the hyperlink becane invalid).

The point was that if you had access to it, you could do some bad stuff but you wont ever have access to it.

You cant have access to the blockchain so you couldnt change anything. Saying “if i had access to the blockchain,…” is like saying “if I had access to your stuff, I could steal it”. Yeah, thats right but that doesnt mean anything…

In theory If you had access to the block chain and another picture you can just change the picture stored at that point

In theory if you had access to your bank’s safe you could just take out money.

Well, you dont.

Its like buying gold on the stock market pretty much. You cant have it in your hands but you still own it and it has value