For that particular website yes, but a salted client side hash is worthless on a different website.
Edit: plus even unsalted it would only work if the algorithm is the same and less iterations are done
For that particular website yes, but a salted client side hash is worthless on a different website.
Edit: plus even unsalted it would only work if the algorithm is the same and less iterations are done
It helps against the server being able to read the password, so a bad actor (either the website itself or after a hack) could read your password. Which isn’t bad if you’re using good password hygiene with random passwords, but that sadly is not the norm.
Why would you not hash in the browser. Doing so makes sure the plaintext password never even gets to the server while still providing the same security.
Edit: I seem to be getting downvoted… Bitwarden does exactly what I described above and I presume they know more than y’all in terms of security https://bitwarden.com/help/what-encryption-is-used/#pbkdf2
That’s gonna depend on your launcher, for me it’s just long press an icon + tap edit
You can set any icon to anything you want so doesn’t even need to be fake.
Does rounding up to the nearest 5 (when reasonable) count because I don’t like coins?
Only time I ever felt small was when I stepped off the train in The Netherlands. (2m)
Seeing as you had about a 3 frame window to line up the middle one (and pure chance to line up the bottom one), don’t be too hard on yourself
Train system is not exactly viable here compared to using a car (Belgium)
Edit: but yeah the rest is about right
Something something Firefox extension: “I don’t care about cookies”
Small bits like caps can’t get sorted for recycling for some reason, so they’re just “waste” instead of recyclable
Problem with that is that simply pasting your signature is in no way legally binding. Someone could crop your signature out of a random document and then sign a bunch of papers with it.
With a paper copy you’re supposed to keep the hard copy (and so is the other party, that’s why you always sign in doubles).
Hell even printing, signing and scanning is quite vague in terms of legal value… You’d have to actually send the original hard copies by mail to be 100% covered. (With a registered letter at that).
Digital signing will supposedly make this whole process easier, but doing that digital signing can only be executed by a small amount of certified organisations. (As in everyone can digitally sign something with their own keys, but it won’t be legally recognized)
Not a lawyer, just someone who tried to figure out how signing legal documents works to include it in an inhouse program at work
30? I’ve come across website that in this case would list out all 807 partners.
These days that’s still python
I’ve had that running for a while now, sadly some sites give you the option “accept all cookies” or “deny all by getting a monthly subscription” which if using this extension will automatically redirect you.
Aside from that little downside it has made browsing so much better.
They actually tested that, trained a model using only the outputs of the previous generation of model. It takes less iterations of that to completely lose quality than you’d think.
I tried picking up rust for the AoC, but any program I wrote ended up unreadable cuz of this unwrap_or. It just allows too much chaining. Then again other options for chaining operations aren’t much better, like match. Idk what I’m doing wrong or if rust never was meant to be readable.
It is much easier to destroy something than it is to repair it. This applies to the original changes we made through exploitation, pollution, etc. But also to the radical change you propose, it is much easier for it to have a destructive effect compared to having a positive effect.
Use it on your phone, duh :P
Jokes aside I wish windows supported pin+hardware key to log in… But alas that’s an enterprise only thing.