• 0 Posts
  • 88 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 23rd, 2023

help-circle



  • enkers@sh.itjust.workstoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldnon vegan pizza time
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    There’s nothing wrong with shearing sheep if there’s no exploitation occurring. The problem is when you add a profit motive to keep breeding animals designed with their exploitation in mind.

    However, I’m going to go out on limb here, and say there probably aren’t many sheep in the care of vegans except on animal sanctuaries. The important thing is to stop buying wool and funding animal exploitation.














  • I wish 3rd parties were a viable federal election option. But they aren’t yet to a point where they can realistically win in the US.

    Here’s the thing: as long as nobody votes 3rd party, that’s going to continue to be the case indefinitely. Wishing won’t change that.

    Where I’m from we actually have a viable alternative to the centre / centre-right duopoly, and we still hear this sort of rhetoric, even when the outcome is nowhere near predetermined to be one of two options like it is for you guys.

    The crux is, that voting for harm reduction cements you in a local maximum when there are better potential solutions out there.

    Now I’m not saying that justifies voting 3rd party. There are a lot of unknowns. If more and more people started voting 3rd party, how long would it feasibly take to enact change? 2 election cycles? 4? 10? Does it ever even happen? And if so, is the harm caused in that period justified by the outcome? I’m dubious of that proposition.

    Regardless, I think the rhetoric about this issue from both the pro and anti-3rd-partyists tends to be a overly reductive and/or myopic. I think both sides have valid concerns, and the answer isn’t as straightforward as it seems.

    That said, pragmatically, it sucks, but I feel like I do have to discourage voting for a 3rd party.