The other side of the story meets its inevitable conclusion too.

Least the bear only killed her. /s

Most of these either aren’t right or I don’t understand the older language.

It’s not a matter of subsidising. It’s a matter for of approvals processes.

That’s definitely not true in any way shape or form.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/dec/21/pro-nuclear-mp-says-labor-weaponising-csiro-report-showing-renewables-are-cheapest

I’m gonna be real, that’s cause it’s the same guys

You got downvored for truth. That’s pretty sad tbh

All the idiots claiming it’s the moon and giving more details about women’s cycles are missing the point of the quote.

Which is spelled out, but I’ll place it here.

The idea that it was a woman is just as valid as it being a man, but man is always assumed.

The accuracy of the claim is not at issue. The assumption is.

The standard exists because of the difference in frequency and severity of DV