How much money is she spending that just the savings add up to 60’000? Or is that just an error and that’s the joke?

Good thing that module is easy to replace and surprisingly cheap!

Except when the quantity is so low it is not even with checking.

It really sucks, indeed. But I upvote the meme.

Link?

Never heard anyone use “eat you out” on guys. Not sure if anal, but I think also not, since that has its own term.

Indeed, if acidic etc. is what they like they can fuck right off. Of course it is better without!

I think that is the reaction of someone who’s parents did not smoke. Why would that not happen today?

Why are they not all the same number? Multiple people got the same medal? Why is this so much more often with bronze?

Wow, that is so really terrible. I was expecting the car. Sorry to hear that. How is your relationship to her?

Smoke from the car or your mom?

Everything must be made fun of.

Sounds like a reasonable approach, at least if batteries keep improving and getting more cheaper as they did in the past. Working on things that work right now, like modern nuclear, seems like a reasonable addition.

When comparing cost of nuclear vs. wind or solar, it is very easy to get to smaller numbers. But then you have no storage and no massive infrastructure, which means solar and wind can not work. Omitting these costs is a nice way to make it more palatable, but not an honest approach when comparing different technologies.

Yes, sorry for the little error, my point is that m*Hz it is not generally speed but only in specific cases. Hz is not just “per time” but “something occurring x times per time”, like a frequency or revolutions. You can not use it for regular speed, it has to be a periodic event. That is how it is defined:

The hertz is defined as one per second for periodic events.

This is why we have Becquerels to count decay events, which are random and not periodic, but the unit is also 1/s. And for the same reason you can not use m*Bq as speed.

So the ads are “on them”? What does that mean? I have honestly no idea. Why is there a “on us”?

Speed as meter per hertz is a rather odd case, like with a machine that goes in discrete steps.

In any case, I never use implied multiplication (and others) and always simply put everything where it should be.

Thank you for proving me wrong regarding the discussion. It just felt insulting to read, as if the sun only stops shining when the earth doesn’t spin. The tiny fraction of output on overcast days is negligible.

Yes, Dunkelflaute is not impossible to deal with. But we can not bridge these gaps with batteries, as you already pointed out. I doubt that we can bridge it with power from intercontinental transmission lines, given how the politics look like today and how much they need to change first + then actually starting to plan and build it… In 50 year perhaps. But we need a CO2 reducing solution now. Right now. Not in 30 years. Batteries are not relevant now and won’t be in the foreseeable future due to monetary, resource and manufacturing bottlenecks. Storage of electricity to later use it as electricity is simply not feasible right now, apart from the minutes you get from existing hydro storage.

Right “now”, so in the next decade, if we push modern nuclear instead of fossiles (which we need to keep building due to said fluctuations) we will get far less CO2 quickly. At the same time, we can burn the old nuclear “waste”.

Why would you even say something so stupid? I highly doubt that you are interested in a discussion.

But just in case, it is called “Dunkelflaute”. And no, we do not constantly produce so much more energy that losing a lot of capacity makes us “dip below demand”. We constantly only produce as much as we need. But why even discuss this here? People spend their whole career figuring this out, it is obviously not as simple as you make it out to be. Here a report from the EU. Just to show the scale of the project:

It is estimated that 20-30 giga-factories for battery cells production alone will have to be built in Europe

There are about 2 weeks without sun and wind in the whole EU every once in a while (don’t remember, like every 3 years?). How are 6 hours supposed to help? How much would these only 6 hours of storage capacity cost (pick some country, perhaps not Norway or Iceland).

Because thousands died from it. How many died from the nuclear power? Ah about 0? 1? here the article about it 360 billion damage (vs <200 billion clean up) 20’000 dead (vs. 0 or 1) By 2015, 4 years after the flooding, still more displaced than Fukushima ever did!

Why should the “what about” about the power plant be do important but not the bigger disaster that caused it? Like who cares about 50’000 dollar cash that is lost when a house burns down and people die?