selfhost.eu offers dynamic DNS which works perfectly fine with my router, using their API access as documented by them. It also works perfectly well with Let’s Encrypt integrated in Nginx Proxy Manager.

• can handle .at domains
• is not Cloudflare
• is registrar and name server
• is European (Germany)
• supports Nginx Proxy Manager

They’re in the market since 2001, I use them since ca. 2010 and never had any issues. Their website looks ancient, almost historic. But it’s functional.

If someone has the “ultimate solution” to something, they wouldn’t give it away in the Internet for “just $29.99”.

Someone else will continue selling RAM and making money.

The USA are a circus only existing to entertain the rest of the world.

Yes!

The URLs mentioned in their blog article all have a wrong certificate (different host name).

I am sure if they fix it Google’s system would reclassify the sites as safe.

has led to a lot of the same moderation rot on Lemmy

Almost as if the platform wasn’t the problem.

So, they gave in to the AI hype, too?

FreeCAD: Pros: free, open source. Cons: workflow as rough as sandpaper, constantly crashes.

It has a learning curve (like all software), yes. But I cannot confirm the crashes.

• Mail with all the bells and whistles (been there, done that – but I just want this to work and not care about details).
• Dynamic DNS because I just need to tell someone my non-static IP so they can connect that with my domain name.

Even after years of being used as a meme template, this stock photo is still as aesthetically pleasing as a Renaissance painting.

I am so glad that I’m using an adblocker that filters out 90% of the crap. The other 10% of the crap are killed by cookie whitelist and Javascript whitelist.

I’m going to voluntarily read other people’s AI slop.

“No honey, the shirt isn’t the problem here.”

New users are expected to keep copying and pasting commands from their browsers to their terminal which compromises some Linux security defenses.

To me, this is the worst issue here.

Even large Projects suggest things that are basically curl | sh – without even mentioning anything about how this could be problematic.

New user are “trained” doing this.

Every project suggesting it should be not only opposed but actively fought against until they change this bullshit.

Brother, do you have BEÄNS?

The IPv6 range is barely even used.

Yet.

Also I imagine that there will be a secondary market for IPv6 at some point.

Like there already is one for IPv4 addresses?

I stand by my point:

No-one will ever need a /48 range.

The ranges will become larger over time because “we have it”, and companies will get thousands of sections with figuratively unlimited IP addresses in them each.

With this huge ranges we’ll have the same problem with IPv6 in a few years that we already have with IPv4.