If they cancel it I don’t need to support it

I’ve heard but not confirmed that the various NUC models have CEC

It’s incrementing the problem counter in different threads

Understood. CG-NAT has been so annoying, I would love for IPv6 to completely replace v4 ASAP

I figure the mobile carrier was blocking incoming connections to my phone. This was a couple of years ago, things might have changed since then.

Thank you

I didn’t mean prevent, just makes it harder by default. You can still open connections from within the NAT

Edit: I do admit to failing at accessing my IPv6 PC from my IPv6 phone

Edit2: apparently NAT is full of security bugs

You’re talking about NAT traversal? We do have control over which we apps we run though?

Edit: apparently NAT is full of bugs

I still have to initiate the outgoing UDP. Are you talking about the specific case where any software running on my host can initiate it without me requesting?

Edit: apparently NAT is full of security bugs

The main benefit of a NAT is that by default it prevents all external access to the hosts inside the network. Any port you have open is not accessible unless explicitly forwarded.

This has a lot of security benefits. Regardless, everything you said is sounds true to me.

Why do you say NAT doesn’t make a network more secure?

deleted by creator

How do you actually do that?

Could have pihole running on your desktop as a backup

1W would be 8.769kWh per year. Pricing is regional.

“you’re not wrong, you’re just an asshole”

Did you try another power supply?

Dave’s Garage, the man who created task manager