So 58% of districts are at or above median income, but only 24% of districts have more drivers than riders?
Could it be that both variables are closely correlated, and the latter is just sampling closer to the tail end of the distribution?
I don’t have any direct experience with that, and I can’t say if it’s a good or bad idea—but I’d say if you’re going to do it, it can’t hurt to do it with some friends and try to create some positive new experiences to overwrite the traumatic ones.
Yeah—Milton’s Paradise Lost seems closer to the modern conception.
I think that’s reversing cause and effect: the AI bubble is the result of the preexisting corporate practice of enshittification getting a new toy to play with.
Immediate civilizational collapse.
Additional weight makes it harder to accelerate, but once you’re up to a steady speed it doesn’t make much difference.
On the other hand, using your arms as counterweights makes it possible to transfer more force from your foot to the ground with each step.
Syncthing uses a centralized discovery server to connect device IDs to IP addresses (although you can change this to point to your own discovery server, too).
I don’t know if Funkwhale has a similar option.
Sometime after sunrise.
There are actually two issues:
The most obvious effect of inbreeding is the increase in homozygosity for deleterious mutations, causing more birth defects.
A subtler effect is the loss of genetic diversity reducing a population’s ability to continue to evolve in response to future selection pressures. This would be especially important when migrating to a new environment with new selection pressures the species has never encountered before.
The logo is for SE Asia Stats, so their purpose is probably to compare SE Asia to the rest of the world.
You’re not wrong—the protests in their current form aren’t going to achieve anything by themselves.
But adding some specific set of demands will accomplish even less: it will alienate supporters who don’t agree with all the demands, and it will allow Trump to claim to address the issues by cherry-picking and distorting the demands beyond recognition (see the Black Lives Matter protests a few years ago).
If we reach a critical point where mass protests can achieve some real, concrete good, it will be due to contingent circumstances that neither side was able to predict. But the contribution the current protests can make to that moment is to give everyone the confidence that the numbers are on their side, once suitable leverage is found.
If a bus driver is trying to drive off a cliff, the passengers can band together to stop it even if they haven’t all agreed on a preferred destination.
Since a theoretical communist society would be stateless, the idea of a fully communist country is an oxymoron. Instead you have countries claiming to be transitional states that are laying the groundwork for true communism at some point in the future.
The “Fall of Rome” conflates a lot of different events, covering over a thousand years:
The one most usually thought of is the fall of the western empire… and while it was preceded by some stupid policy decisions, they weren’t notably more stupid than many other decisions the empire made over the previous five centuries. From an institutional perspective, it was actually a relatively boring period.
(Many of the other comments here are pointing to things that were pretty much constants for most of the empire’s existence, so if you want to blame them for the fall, you need to explain why the empire didn’t fall 500 years earlier.)
To be fair, the community name is semantically ambiguous.
I think you’d have better luck doing it the other way around: fingerprint known non-AI content, and treat everything else as potential AI.
It’s saying 38 is the maximum lifespan predicted by their model—but it also says their model has an R2 of 0.76, meaning it only predicts about 76% of the variation in the actual measured values. And then they discuss other factors that could account for the remaining 24% of the variation, including post-reproductive-age lifespan.
Unless I missed something, the word “telomere” doesn’t occur in the article or its source paper—rather, it discusses the rate of DNA methylation.
IMO, the key passage in the paper is this:
However, any genetic regulation for a species may potentially be a secondary factor as there may be other environmental selective pressures. This may be the case with species which have lifespans post reproductive age and therefore, there may be non-genetic factors that may be more predictive of their maximum lifespan.
I suspect that the methylation rate is actually tracking the end of the reproductive stage of the lifecycle, rather than the entire lifespan—it’s just that humans have an unusually long post-reproductive stage.
Storing information while simultaneously keeping it private requires an ongoing resource expenditure—and every day you’re storing it, there’s a non-zero chance that it gets corrupted or leaked anyway. So secrets have a half-life, just like radiation—and in the limit, all information will either be public or lost.
Before trains, sea travel was the standard way to travel long distances even if a land route was available. Sea voyages came to represent any destination that was far enough away that communities wouldn’t be in regular contact.