PS2 released in 2000. By 2002, Dreamcast already went under and Xbox and GameCube were about to release.
PS2 released in 2000. By 2002, Dreamcast already went under and Xbox and GameCube were about to release.
Keep it on non-dangerous topics and I’m with ya lol
You can get alarms that you place under the mattress and they shake the entire bed
And how do they make their money?
Because hosting shit yourself isn’t free, and most people aren’t up for taking financial losses for their projects.
It’s a bit more complicated than simply taking the worst experiences someone has ever had.
Every experience, every story from friends, every story in the news, heck even portrayals in fiction, contribute to someone’s perception of an event, object, person or even group.
Now place yourself in the position of your average woman. You hear rape stories on the news, probably known a few people that have been SA’d if it hasn’t happened to you personally, and you’ve almost certainly had a few close calls at least. Are you telling me you wouldn’t have your guard up?
Which is why the important lesson from the bear meme is that a whole lot of women are incredibly stupid.
Woah woah woah, hold the fuck on for two fucking seconds.
First of all, as I said before, this shit goes both ways. Men do this too.
Secondly, I did NOT say that using our perceptions is a bad way to make decisions. Multiple experienced incidents and multiple stories can create a perception of danger, and that perception may be wrong at times, but it can also be dead on at critical moments. It is a survival tactic that serves people well in general.
You’re using the bear analogy wrong. If the bear analogy was about statistics, they’d choose the human because statistically speaking, many, many more people are helpful than harmful. Especially compared to a dangerous wild animal.
People pick the bear because they themselves have been hurt too many times or have heard of people being hurt too many times. There is a perception that the bear is safer.
That can go both ways. And often people choosing the bear can be in a vulnerable state, which the likes of Andrew Tate preys on.
Choosing the bear is how one starts on either path. Then they get manipulated by hate spreaders and fraudsters.
This company wasn’t exactly targeted. It could have happened to literally anyone.
Many do. Why is why we have MGTOW and Andrew Tate
They believe Tories don’t go far enough.
Correct. But it’s either this or literally starve. That’s why you’ve got people here saying it isn’t really a choice.
It can be. Depending on the circumstances in life you are in, credit may be the only way you’re able to pay for food.
deleted by creator
Also the app is used by children.
It’s not scary in any way though? Or inappropriate for kids in any way?
Calling it nightmare fuel is quite the stretch tbh. It’s like calling a 6ft basketball player incredibly tall.
There will always be garbage, pants-on-heads stupidity on these platforms. I doubt the women saying this even believe what they are saying, it’s all to drive engagement via outrage
I understand the main thing was Yuzu was apparently offering builds that work with unreleased games (which how tf does that work)
Leaks and breaking release date is how it works.
So this looks like it’s based in Java code.
A public class means that any bit of Java code, including that injected by an attacker, can see and mess with the contents of that class.
A private class, in contrast, means that other bits of Java code are restricted to running the class’s predefined functions.
In theory it is supposed to help with the security of the data. In practice if an attacker gets to this point, you’ve got much bigger issues.
Ahh sorry I’m thinking of EU launch dates