hoch@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 6 months agoMore code = more betterimagemessage-square24linkfedilinkarrow-up1283arrow-down15
arrow-up1278arrow-down1imageMore code = more betterhoch@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 6 months agomessage-square24linkfedilink
minus-squareferric_carcinization@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·6 months agoI don’t know what I was thinking. But, if you borrow C’s semantics, you are allowed to “optimize” away side-effect-less loops, even if they would never terminate. But that would require the random method to be pure.
I don’t know what I was thinking.
But, if you borrow C’s semantics, you are allowed to “optimize” away side-effect-less loops, even if they would never terminate. But that would require the random method to be pure.