• Stumblinbear@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    No, reddit demanded ludicrously high fees at barely 30 days notice. It gave nobody any time at all to figure out alternative monetization strategies. Many of the third party apps had expressed their willingness to pay, but that was just absurd

    • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Most of these apps had subscriptions already in place. All they had to do was remove the free access and maybe increase the subscription price a bit to $5/month (I’m not sure what they were charging before).

      • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        They also had ads, which they’d no longer gain revenue from. Ads can pull in $3-5 per month per user. That’s a massive loss.

            • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Apart from the ones that pay. You only need to look at any of the sync posts on here to see there are many, many of them.

              • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Ad revenue very often dwarfs the income from subscribing users by a huge margin. Sure, a single user subscribing pays for themselves plus a little extra, but your free users make up 70-80% of your revenue

                • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Sure, but again - removing the app takes away 100% of the revenue. Keeping it as subscription only gets you some revenue. Some > none.

                  • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    The amount of people that subscribe would likely not pay for the ongoing maintenance costs unless he’s willing to work for shit pay. Every hour he puts into maintenance is an hour he didn’t put into maintenance the other version that actually pays well enough