banner80@fedia.io to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoNever tire of winningfedia.ioimagemessage-square131linkfedilinkarrow-up11.54Karrow-down152
arrow-up11.49Karrow-down1imageNever tire of winningfedia.iobanner80@fedia.io to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square131linkfedilink
minus-squareKⒶMⒶLⒶ WⒶLZ 2Ⓐ24@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoyou didn’t need to but you did choose to preface this with “technically” which should have tipped you off that this really isn’t in the same arena.
minus-squareAngryCommieKender@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoNo, but it is an excuse to share this article about that law. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/15/us/politics/qualified-immunity-supreme-court.html This really means that Harlow v Fitzgerald should be overturned.
you didn’t need to but you did choose to preface this with “technically” which should have tipped you off that this really isn’t in the same arena.
No, but it is an excuse to share this article about that law.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/15/us/politics/qualified-immunity-supreme-court.html
This really means that Harlow v Fitzgerald should be overturned.