Profitez des vidéos et de la musique que vous aimez, mettez en ligne des contenus originaux, et partagez-les avec vos amis, vos proches et le monde entier.
Multiunit housing is actually a lot more efficient, cheaper to build and reduces sprawl. Building multi family housing with passive heating and cooling is actually comparable to traditional multi family housing costs.
In a better world that would be how we solve the housing crisis. Move more people together (better for mass transit, utilities, and services).
Then you can keep a smaller (greener) camper van for weekending or holidays to escape.
Totally agree on multi-unit efficiency, but tiny homes can still be better than sprawling suburbs in areas where dense housing isnt feasible due to zoning or infrastructure limitations.
Bigger buildings have a bigger impact on the environment, tiny homes are a good thing
Only if you let it, most vans are diesel and that’s bad for the environment.
Our big house has solar panels and we make more electricity then we can use, so help the grid be greener.
We also don’t follow the norm of buy everything that we don’t need
Multiunit housing is actually a lot more efficient, cheaper to build and reduces sprawl. Building multi family housing with passive heating and cooling is actually comparable to traditional multi family housing costs.
In a better world that would be how we solve the housing crisis. Move more people together (better for mass transit, utilities, and services).
Then you can keep a smaller (greener) camper van for weekending or holidays to escape.
Totally agree on multi-unit efficiency, but tiny homes can still be better than sprawling suburbs in areas where dense housing isnt feasible due to zoning or infrastructure limitations.