• skittlebrau@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Each year I seem to think “this will be the year I set up IPv6 in my homelab” - but then I never get around to it.

    If I have to run both v4 and v6 concurrently, there isn’t much incentive/motivation for me to use v6 locally.

    Maybe I’ll get around to it when there’s a net benefit for me for my use case, or when I’m forced to.

    Am I just imagining it to be more complicated than it actually is?

    My router runs pfsense and I have 6 VLANs each with its own subnet - Management, Trusted, IoT, Cameras, Guest, and Web Facing Servers.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Its a mind shift cause so use to NAT and ipv4. But it is not they hard. I’m glad I learned it, but the beginning was tuff.

    • Album@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s honestly super simple to set up. Outside of your ISP config it’s almost all autoconfig. 100% of the complication (at least for me) comes from knowing ipv4 first for 20 years and then trying to incorrectly map those concepts to V6.

      As soon as I “let go” it was fine.

      There’s not a huge net benefit you’re right. I mostly wanted to learn and I hope to be at the front edge of disabling ipv4 in the near distant future.

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        The benefit is being able to easily access devices from the internet. The same address works on the LAN and WAN. There’s no port forwarding, so multiple devices can have the same port open. You also don’t need to mess with a VPN if your IPv4 connection uses CGNAT.

        • Album@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          Yeah dropping Nat is the biggest net benefit I agree but I think the avg person won’t really find that much value in it when Nat works ok

          • Auli@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            And the average person is going to be using it without knowing. And never complain or anything.

          • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            NAT works fine until you get stuck on CGNAT and can’t host anything on IPv4 without using a VPN.

            • Tja@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              Meh, nothing a VPN and a 3 bucks a month VPS can’t solve…

              yells at cloud in IPv4

              • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 days ago

                Yet.

                As IPv4 blocks get scarcer and ISP’s get more customers, they’ll all eventually have to move to IPv4 CGNAT.

                And that’s completely fine for most people.

                If you’re not one of those people, then IPv6 is your saviour.

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        An issue I had the last time I tried to set up IPv6 up was pihole didn’t work as well as I would have preferred. I assumed I just didn’t set up things correctly and it’s looking like that is the case based on the OP.

        It kept resolving ad domains with their IPv6 address.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Who cares if it access them over ipv6. Their still blocked.

          • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            If ad domains can be resolved to their IPv6 addresses, it means that they are not blocked. Your device connects to the IPv6 address and serves the ad.

            I can’t remember what the problem was but my window to rollback was closing so I reverted back to IPv4 only and pushed it to another day.

      • skittlebrau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Thanks, I’ll give it a go!

        I suppose it’ll be easy since my whole stack uses IPv4, so I’ll be simply adding another interface on without service disruptions.

    • vodka@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      If you happen to torrent a fair bit (especially public trackers) then ipv6 can make a huge difference, there’s loads of ipv6 only seeders and leechers I’m suddenly reaching.