• Sybil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I know you disagree with anarchist tactics. That’s what our whole discussion is about.

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Do you not also disagree with those tactics, given how spectacularly they’ve failed to amount to anything material?

      • Sybil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        no. I think they could have won 100 years ago and I think they could win tomorrow. I like the tactic. people can be inspired and it can happen in an instant.

              • Sybil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                you don’t know the future anymore than I. you don’t know what the next revolution will look like or what would start it.

                  • Sybil@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    do I want to bet that you don’t know the future? absolutely. here’s a proof.

                    knowledge is defined as a justified true belief.
                    you can't have evidence about the future because it hasn't happened.
                    truth claims about the future have no value because it hasn't happened.
                    there is no justification that can produce knowledge about the future.
                    
                    you don't know the future.
                    

                    qed

                    edit: oh fuck. I was supposed to bet something. how about a loaf of bread?