• pm_boobs_send_nudes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    In that case it sounds like you would have been better off being a politician (they make the laws), judge (you can give minimal sentences) or just a lobbyist / non-profit.

    • WtfEvenIsExistence3️@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Being a judge practically requires having a law degree as a prerequisite (and also convincing whoever appoints judges to appoint you or convincing people to elect you), being a politician requires actually convincing people to vote for you, also lots of funding for advertising. Much more difficult than being a lawyer.

      • pm_boobs_send_nudes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Agreed, only reason I suggested this is because as a lawyer, you will at most practice in just one district. In a country with thousands of districts. Even then you may not get a lot of clients who you seek to help against unjust laws, because they have to select you too and it’s a free market. Would just be impractical to make a big difference.