sanitation@lemmy.today to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoOne of the lowercase m is actually an r + n, and the other isn't.imagemessage-square116linkfedilinkarrow-up1811arrow-down19
arrow-up1802arrow-down1imageOne of the lowercase m is actually an r + n, and the other isn't.sanitation@lemmy.today to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square116linkfedilink
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up42·1 month agoZooming in, they look absolutely identical to me.
minus-squareNeatNit@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·1 month agoThe first one looks ever so sightly wider to me, but their shape is exactly the same otherwise and it would be impossible to notice if no one told me
minus-squareHideakikarate@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·1 month agoI feel like the first one being “rn” just because that first hump looks ever so slightly more bold than the entirety of the second “m”.
minus-squareraef@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agothe “arm” on the r is a little straighter
Zooming in, they look absolutely identical to me.
The first one looks ever so sightly wider to me, but their shape is exactly the same otherwise and it would be impossible to notice if no one told me
I feel like the first one being “rn” just because that first hump looks ever so slightly more bold than the entirety of the second “m”.
the “arm” on the r is a little straighter