Scrutinizing evidence is important. The fact you refuse to provide any because it will be scrutinized is ridiculous. (Although unfortunately not that surprising seeing as you’re a zenzite)
I never said I refuse. I am currently in transport. It’s not conducive to a proper response, just short messages such as this. Also I never said that scrutinizing wasn’t important. I’m not sure your response has much to do with what I said in my previous message.
Now I can post links but then you will tell me any information I bring is corrupt or propaganda so we can skip the effort I would put in that will be wasted anyways.
This is what you said. You won’t bother posting any evidence because it will be scrutinized. Why bother lying when it’s so easily fact checkable?
Either that or one sentence gets picked out of the response and the whole rest of the response gets ignored. It becomes somewhat pointless.
Scrutinizing evidence is important. The fact you refuse to provide any because it will be scrutinized is ridiculous. (Although unfortunately not that surprising seeing as you’re a zenzite)
I never said I refuse. I am currently in transport. It’s not conducive to a proper response, just short messages such as this. Also I never said that scrutinizing wasn’t important. I’m not sure your response has much to do with what I said in my previous message.
This is what you said. You won’t bother posting any evidence because it will be scrutinized. Why bother lying when it’s so easily fact checkable?
I will go through their response and check their links and if it’s a good faith discussion then I will likely continue.
Given that you refuse to provide the evidence for the claims you made, it’s already a bad faith discussion on your part.
X