I vote for naming this branch “mommy”, since all other branches are it’s offspring, and related to it.

deleted by creator

The logo in the top left corner

The icons in the dock

deleted by creator

Well you’ll never get a “fair” comparison, because the environmental effects are never properly priced into the consumer price.

That would make it steeper, no?

Actually muscles are what keeps you warm.

The amount of fat required to provide significant insulation is not really feasible for humans with the addition that the feeling of being cold might even be increased.

https://weather.com/health/news/do-fat-people-stay-warmer-cold-weather-thin-people-20140103

Surprise surprise, People attempt illegal things all the time

It’s a risk reward analysis and not strictly a 1:1 hour pay relation. No one guarantees you any positive outcome here.

Best case I get the fee removed after a short conversation.

Worst case, I have to engage in a long drawn argument still having to pay full afterwards.

Or anything in between, such as still having to pay full, but they’ll make this clearer in their menu.

best case was a simple mistake and I just have to ask politely. This can be considered very unlikely in this case because the recipient has a dedicated section for the fee, indicating that they’re not going to make any change to the bill. So the risk reward is highly leaning towards the worst case as the expected outcome.

That would be consequent, but usually it’s not worth the trouble.

I’d rather leave with 20 quid less than wasting 30 min of my time.

🦆ing

NGL withdrawal during a natural disaster sounds pretty ducking dangerous.

It’s simple, if a restaurant adds something to the bill I did not agree to beforehand I’ll never eat there again.

Try nvim

Where you put it is not my problem.

The general census is that latex actually is an example of programming languages sharing semantics with non programming languages and not being intend as a programming language.

since you linked to wikipedia:

The domain of the language is also worth consideration. Markup languages like XML, HTML, or troff, which define structured data, are not usually considered programming languages.[12][13][14] Programming languages may, however, share the syntax with markup languages if a computational semantics is defined. XSLT, for example, is a Turing complete language entirely using XML syntax.[15][16][17] Moreover, LaTeX, which is mostly used for structuring documents, also contains a Turing complete subset.[18][19]

Programming language

Sometimes even non Turing complete languages are considered a programming language but Turing completeness usually is the criteria agreed upon:

The majority of practical programming languages are Turing complete,[5] and all Turing complete languages can implement the same set of algorithms. ANSI/ISO SQL-92 and Charity are examples of languages that are not Turing complete, yet are often called programming languages.[6][7] However, some authors restrict the term “programming language” to Turing complete languages.[1][8]

SQL is turing complete

This.

Highlight important aspects of the worry with caps

How the car looks when this guy enters the room

Nerds: mate

I don’t understand your intention, as for tips and hints and end you post on this line:

“Ps: if you have a different opinions than I do skip this post”

That’s the perfect recipe for a circle jerk.